01-13-2012, 10:08 PM
uita-te la documentarele despre China Antica. Sa vezi cam de cand dateaza, stai ca am sa caut cateva informatii
.
The Neolithic age in China can be traced back to between 12,000 and 10,000 BC.[7] Early evidence for proto-Chinese millet agriculture is radiocarbon-dated to about 7000 BC.[8] The Peiligang culture of Xinzheng county, Henan was excavated in 1977.[9] With agriculture came increased population, the ability to store and redistribute crops, and the potential to support specialist craftsmen and administrators.[10] In late Neolithic times, the Yellow River valley began to establish itself as a cultural center, where the first villages were founded; the most archaeologically significant of those was found at Banpo, Xi'an.[11] The Yellow River was so named because of loess forming its banks gave a yellowish tint to the water.[12]
The early history of China is made obscure by the lack of written documents from this period, coupled with the existence of accounts written during later time periods that attempted to describe events that had occurred several centuries previously. In a sense, the problem stems from centuries of introspection on the part of the Chinese people, which has blurred the distinction between fact and fiction in regards to this early history.
By 7000 BC, the Chinese were farming millet, giving rise to the Jiahu culture. At Damaidi in Ningxia, 3,172 cliff carvings dating to 6000-5000 BC have been discovered "featuring 8,453 individual characters such as the sun, moon, stars, gods and scenes of hunting or grazing." These pictographs are reputed to be similar to the earliest characters confirmed to be written Chinese.[13][14] Later Yangshao culture was superseded by the Longshan culture around 2500 BC.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_China#Prehistory
aici vezi putin despre istoria Chinei, de cand dateaza primele vestigii.
Documentare voi cauta maine, astazi nu prea am chef. Oricum oasele dinozaurilor si diferite roci, mai ales gheata de la polul nord vorbeste despre aceasta planeta destul. Trebuie sa gandesti putin logic. Daca dinozaurii ar fi existat prin 6000 cand a fost creata lumea sa zicem, atunci, oamenii ar fi fost decimati din cauza faptului ca oricat te-ai chinui nu ai putea sa infrangi o hoarda de soparle care sar pe tine. Mai ales ca atunci se stie ca a fost epoca de piatra. In plus prin 5000-4000 a aparut scrierea cuneiforma, deci daca ar fi existat dinozaurii in acea perioada, s-ar fi scris despre ei. In plus sunt multe oase de om care dateaza de 50000 de ani. Oase extrem de rudimentare in comparatie cu ale noastre. Deoarece craniul era mai solid, defapt toate oasele erau mai solide. Pamantul nu avea cum sa apara acum 6000 de ani avand in vedere ca o planeta se formeaza in milioane de ani. Uite ce e, sunt multe dovezi ca omenirea e mai veche de 6000 de ani, iar pamantul si mai si. La chestia cu big bangul mai bine nu ma bag. Dar eu nu cred ca ar trebui sa credem religia sau stinta, ci sa le combinam, caci daca le combinam atunci putem demonstra ceva, daca nu, aceste lucruri vor ramane in negura tot timpul.

The Neolithic age in China can be traced back to between 12,000 and 10,000 BC.[7] Early evidence for proto-Chinese millet agriculture is radiocarbon-dated to about 7000 BC.[8] The Peiligang culture of Xinzheng county, Henan was excavated in 1977.[9] With agriculture came increased population, the ability to store and redistribute crops, and the potential to support specialist craftsmen and administrators.[10] In late Neolithic times, the Yellow River valley began to establish itself as a cultural center, where the first villages were founded; the most archaeologically significant of those was found at Banpo, Xi'an.[11] The Yellow River was so named because of loess forming its banks gave a yellowish tint to the water.[12]
The early history of China is made obscure by the lack of written documents from this period, coupled with the existence of accounts written during later time periods that attempted to describe events that had occurred several centuries previously. In a sense, the problem stems from centuries of introspection on the part of the Chinese people, which has blurred the distinction between fact and fiction in regards to this early history.
By 7000 BC, the Chinese were farming millet, giving rise to the Jiahu culture. At Damaidi in Ningxia, 3,172 cliff carvings dating to 6000-5000 BC have been discovered "featuring 8,453 individual characters such as the sun, moon, stars, gods and scenes of hunting or grazing." These pictographs are reputed to be similar to the earliest characters confirmed to be written Chinese.[13][14] Later Yangshao culture was superseded by the Longshan culture around 2500 BC.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_China#Prehistory
aici vezi putin despre istoria Chinei, de cand dateaza primele vestigii.
Documentare voi cauta maine, astazi nu prea am chef. Oricum oasele dinozaurilor si diferite roci, mai ales gheata de la polul nord vorbeste despre aceasta planeta destul. Trebuie sa gandesti putin logic. Daca dinozaurii ar fi existat prin 6000 cand a fost creata lumea sa zicem, atunci, oamenii ar fi fost decimati din cauza faptului ca oricat te-ai chinui nu ai putea sa infrangi o hoarda de soparle care sar pe tine. Mai ales ca atunci se stie ca a fost epoca de piatra. In plus prin 5000-4000 a aparut scrierea cuneiforma, deci daca ar fi existat dinozaurii in acea perioada, s-ar fi scris despre ei. In plus sunt multe oase de om care dateaza de 50000 de ani. Oase extrem de rudimentare in comparatie cu ale noastre. Deoarece craniul era mai solid, defapt toate oasele erau mai solide. Pamantul nu avea cum sa apara acum 6000 de ani avand in vedere ca o planeta se formeaza in milioane de ani. Uite ce e, sunt multe dovezi ca omenirea e mai veche de 6000 de ani, iar pamantul si mai si. La chestia cu big bangul mai bine nu ma bag. Dar eu nu cred ca ar trebui sa credem religia sau stinta, ci sa le combinam, caci daca le combinam atunci putem demonstra ceva, daca nu, aceste lucruri vor ramane in negura tot timpul.
"Errare humanum est sed perseverare diabolicum."
"Gutta cavat lapidem non vi, sed saepe cadendo."
"Inter arma silent leges."
"Gutta cavat lapidem non vi, sed saepe cadendo."
"Inter arma silent leges."